Proppant Transport in the Low-Flow Oil Wells

Abstract


The efficiency of low-flow oil wells after hydraulic fracturing is frequently compromised by residual proppant and early-phase proppant production, which can penetrate pumps and severely diminish their lifespan. Proppant management in such wells remains a persistent challenge, particularly due to the inadequate understanding of how proppant travels from the wellbore bottom to the pump intake. This study bridges that critical knowledge gap by introducing pioneering experimental findings on proppant behavior in low-flow conditions—the first to clarify the primary mechanisms at play. Using advanced laboratory simulations replicating post-fracturing environments, we observe that proppant consistently reaches the pump intake via an unnoticed process: immiscible hydrocarbon fluid droplets encapsulate and transport proppant particles upward. Key results include the revelation that the viscosity of the immiscible phase (e.g., oil or kerosene) does not significantly affect droplet transport capacity. Furthermore, proppant concentration during transport shows no correlation with well flow rates, overturning conventional assumptions. A groundbreaking insight is the role of free gas bubbles: they increase the likelihood of proppant being captured by hydrocarbon droplets, with higher gas volumes directly linked to elevated proppant levels in the flow. These conclusions are substantiated by field data from wells exhibiting high free gas content near the bottomhole, where shorter pump operational periods coincided with the proposed mechanism. By identifying this transport process, the research lays the groundwork for tailored proppant management solutions, paving the way for improved pump durability and operational performance in low-flow oil wells.

Full Text

14

About the authors

E. V Kozhevnikov

Perm National Research Polytechnic University

Z. G Ivanov

Perm National Research Polytechnic University

Ahmad Farid Bin Abu Bakar

University of Malaya

Khairul Azlan Mustapha

University of Malaya

D. V Kobyakov

Perm National Research Polytechnic University

Liyuan Yu

China University of Mining and Technology

F. B Belkov

Perm National Research Polytechnic University

D. S Fedurov

Perm National Research Polytechnic University

A. P Petrovykh

Perm National Research Polytechnic University

References

  1. Turbakov M., Shcherbakov А. Determination of Enhanced Oil Recovery Candidate Fields in the Volga-Ural Oil and Gas Region Territory. Energies (Basel), 2015, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 11153-11166. doi: 10.3390/en81011153
  2. Novikov V.A., Martyushev D.A. Study of the Influence of Well Operation Parameters of a Carbonate Reservoir Oil Formation on the Coefficient of Productivity Using Statistical Methods of Analysis. Georesources, 2024, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 187-199. doi: 10.18599/grs.2024.4.10
  3. Kozhevnikov E.V. et al. Apparent Permeability Evolution Due to Colloid Migration Under Cyclic Confining Pressure: On the Example of Porous Limestone. Transp. Porous Media, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s11242-023-01979-5
  4. Dieng А., Khiznyk G.P., Poplygin V.V. Prediction of the Efficiency of Hydraulic Fracturing Based on Reservoir Parameters. International Journal of Engineering, 2023, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 2169-2174.
  5. Khizhniak G.P., Dieng A. Influence technological parameters on hydraulic fracturing efficiency. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University Geo Assets Engineering, 2023, vol. 334, no. 6, pp. 120-125. doi: 10.18799/24131830/2023/6/4092
  6. Guo J. et al. Preparation and properties of epoxy semi-coated quartz sand proppant decorated with stearic acid functionalized TiO2 nanoparticles. Adv. Compos Hybrid Mater., 2025, vol. 8, no. 2, 192 p. doi: 10.1007/s42114-025-01251-y
  7. Pei Y., Xiong H. Enhancing Well Performance and Economic Value via Better Well Completion Design-A Delaware Basin Case Study. SPE Journal, 2023, vol. 28, no. 03, pp. 934-949. doi: 10.2118/214284-PA
  8. Riabokon E. et al. Effects of ultrasonic oscillations on permeability of rocks during the paraffinic oil flow. Géotechnique Letters, 2023, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1-20. doi: 10.1680/jgele.22.00137
  9. Parker M., Weaver J., Van Batenburg D. Understanding Proppant Flowback. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. SPE, 1999. doi: 10.2118/56726-MS
  10. Pandey V.J. Proppant Flowback Prevention and Control by Analysis of Early Time Well Production Data. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. SPE, 2023. doi: 10.2118/214959-MS
  11. Guo J. et al. Preparation and characterization of nanotitania@fatty acid modified quartz sand proppant with super-hydrophobic and oleophilic properties. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 2024, vol. 699. 134623 p. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.134623
  12. Poplygin V. et al. Assessment of the Elastic-Wave Well Treatment in Oil-Bearing Clastic and Carbonate Reservoirs. Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing, 2023, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1495-1505. doi: 10.32604/fdmp.2023.022335
  13. Dengaev A. et al. Modeling Results for the Real Horizontal Heavy-Oil-Production Well of Mechanical Solids. Energies (Basel), 2022, vol. 15, no. 14, 5182 p. doi: 10.3390/en15145182
  14. Sreenivasan H., Krishna S. Automatic sucker rod pump fault diagnostics by transfer learning using googlenet integrated machine learning classifiers. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2024, vol. 191, pp. 14-26. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2024.08.059
  15. Webster C.McK., Tovar D J.J. Solving Sanding Problems using a Sand Production Management System. Case Histories. SPE Offshore Europe Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. SPE, 1999. doi: 10.2118/56948-MS
  16. Peretomode E., Oluyemi G., Faisal N.H. Sand production due to chemical-rock interaction. A review. Eng. Fail. Anal., 2022, vol. 142, 106745 p. DOI: 10.1016/ j.engfailanal.2022.106745
  17. Boutt D.F., Cook B.K., Williams J.R. A coupled fluid-solid model for problems in geomechanics: Application to sand production. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech., 2011, vol. 35, no. 9. pp. 997-1018. doi: 10.1002/nag.938
  18. Karev V.I., Khimulia V.V., Shevtsov N.I. Experimental Studies of the Deformation, Destruction and Filtration in Rocks: A Review. Mechanics of Solids, 2021, vol. 56, no. 5. pp. 613-630. doi: 10.3103/S0025654421050125
  19. Riabokon E. et al. Nonlinear Young’s Modulus of New Red Sandstone: Experimental Studies. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2021, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 989-999. doi: 10.1007/s10338-021-00298-w
  20. Kozhevnikov E.V. et al. Colloidal-induced permeability degradation assessment of porous media. Géotechnique Letters, 2022, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 217-224. doi: 10.1680/jgele.22.00017
  21. Ahad N.A., Jami M., Tyson S. A review of experimental studies on sand screen selection for unconsolidated sandstone reservoirs. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol., 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1675-1688. doi: 10.1007/s13202-019-00826-y
  22. Salahi A. et al. Sand production control mechanisms during oil well production and construction. Petroleum Research, 2021, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 361-367. DOI: 10.1016/ j.ptlrs.2021.02.005
  23. Bianco L.C.B., Halleck P.M. Mechanisms of Arch Instability and Sand Production in Two-Phase Saturated Poorly Consolidated Sandstones. All Days. SPE, 2001. doi: 10.2118/68932-MS
  24. Hall C.D., Harrisberger W.H. Stability of Sand Arches: A Key to Sand Control. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1970, vol. 22, no. 07, pp. 821-829. doi: 10.2118/2399-PA
  25. Khan J.A. et al. Sand screen selection by sand retention test: a review of factors affecting sand control design. J. Pet Explor Prod Technol., 2024, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 2157-2182. doi: 10.1007/s13202-024-01803-w
  26. Riabokon E. et al. Resonance induced restoration of rock permeability degraded by heavy components of crude oil. Deep Underground Science and Engineering, 2025. doi: 10.1002/dug2.70020
  27. Arshadi M. et al. The effect of deformation on two-phase flow through proppant-packed fractured shale samples: A micro-scale experimental investigation. Adv. Water Resour. Elsevier Ltd, 2017, vol. 105, pp. 108-131. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.04.022
  28. Zhiliang W. et al. Study of sand particle transport characteristics and different critical velocities in sand-producing wells via indoor experiments. Sci. Rep., 2025, vol. 15, no. 1, 9707 p. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-87386-w
  29. Hari S. et al. Impact of reservoir, fracturing fluid and proppant characteristics on proppant crushing and embedment in sandstone formations. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 2021, vol. 95, 104187 p. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104187
  30. Danso D.K. et al. Recent advances in multifunctional proppant technology and increased well output with micro and nano proppants. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 2021, vol. 196, 108026 p. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108026
  31. Mohammed S. et al. A multi-fractured well performance model for unconventional reservoirs. Heliyon, 2022, vol. 8, no. 10, e10827 p. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10827
  32. Yang Y., Peng H., Wen C. Sand Transport and Deposition Behaviour in Subsea Pipelines for Flow Assurance. Energies (Basel), 2019, vol. 12, no. 21, 4070 p. doi: 10.3390/en12214070
  33. Xu P. et al. Insights of Abrasive Water Jet Slotting on Enhancing Efficiency of Hydraulic Fracturing. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2025, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 1777-1794. doi: 10.1007/s00603-024-04277-8
  34. Liu X. et al. Experimental Investigation of Proppant Production Mitigation in Liquid-Rich Unconventional Wells. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. SPE, 2022. doi: 10.2118/210359-MS
  35. Qu H. et al. Experimental and Simulation Investigations of Proppant Transport and Distribution Between Perforation Clusters in a Horizontal Well. SPE Journal, 2024, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 5286-5304. doi: 10.2118/223087-PA
  36. Deal E. et al. Grain shape effects in bed load sediment transport. Nature, 2023, vol. 613, no. 7943, pp. 298-302. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05564-6
  37. Feng Y. et al. Flow regime and critical deposition velocity of liquid–solid two-phase flow in pipeline: Progress and perspectives. Physics of Fluids, 2023, vol. 35, no. 10. doi: 10.1063/5.0172006
  38. Bakyt N., Zhang H.-Q., Zhu H. Modeling Sand Transportation in Wells Under Different Multiphase Flow Conditions. SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference. SPE, 2022. doi: 10.2118/212093-MS
  39. Najmi K. et al. Experimental Study of Low Concentration Sand Transport in Multiphase Air-Water Horizontal Pipelines. J. Energy Resour. Technol, 2015, vol. 137, no. 3. doi: 10.1115/1.4029602
  40. Nejati H. et al. Liquid-liquid-solid three-phase flow in horizontal wells: flow pattern modeling and dimensionless analysis. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol., 2025, vol. 15, no. 4. 59 p. doi: 10.1007/s13202-025-01954-4
  41. Kozhevnikov E. et al. An Experimental Study of Proppant Transport Mechanisms to the Pump Intake in Low-Flow Oil Wells. Petroleum Research, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.ptlrs.2025.07.007
  42. Zhang R.-Y. et al. Experimental study of the critical sand starting velocity of gas-water-sand flow in an inclined pipe. Pet. Sci., 2022, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 2981-2994. doi: 10.1016/j.petsci.2022.09.004
  43. Kozhevnikov E.V. et al. Cyclic confining pressure and rock permeability: Mechanical compaction or fines migration. Heliyon, 2023, vol. 9, no. 11, e21600 p. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21600
  44. Riabokon E. et al. Acoustic vibration restoration of rock permeability while crude oil filtration containing paraffins. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2024, vol. 238, 212865 p. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.212865
  45. Peng H. et al. Experimental Study for the Effects of Different Factors on the Sand-Carrying Capacity of Slickwater. Geofluids, 2023, vol. 2023, pp. 1-11. doi: 10.1155/2023/7897165
  46. Dontsov E.V. A model for proppant dynamics in a perforated wellbore. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2023, vol. 167, 104552 p. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow. 2023.104552
  47. Ren L. et al. Simulation and analysis of proppant transportation and distribution rules under multi-cluster perforation in horizontal wellbore. Pet. Sci. Technol., 2024, pp. 1-24. doi: 10.1080/10916466.2024.2414843
  48. Kozhevnikov E. et al. The mechanism of porous reservoir permeability deterioration due to pore pressure decrease. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2024, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 96-105. doi: 10.46690/ager.2024.08.04
  49. Kozhevnikov E. et al. Rock permeability evolution during cyclic loading and colloid migration after saturation and drying. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2024, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 208-219. doi: 10.46690/ager.2024.03.05
  50. Li J. et al. Experimental Study of Microproppant Transportation in a Fracture with Operational Factors and Application in a Shale Gas Field. SPE Journal, 2024, vol. 29, no. 09, pp. 4856-4872. doi: 10.2118/221484-PA
  51. Ramazanov V. et al. Enhancing Fracturing Proppant Performance: Methods and Assessment. Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 2025, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 4477-4503. doi: 10.1007/s13369-024-09679-y
  52. Bai Y. et al. Review of advances and applications of weighted fracturing fluid technology. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2025, vol. 250, 213847 p. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213847
  53. Dengaev A. et al. Mechanical Impurities Carry-Over from Horizontal Heavy Oil Production Well. Processes, 2023, vol. 11, no. 10, 2932 p. doi: 10.3390/pr11102932
  54. Umar I.A. et al. An outlook into recent advances on estimation of effective stimulated reservoir volume. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 2021, vol. 88, 103822 p. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.103822
  55. Ozerov A.Yu. et al. Cluster Regime-The New Regime Of Flowing Of Gas-Liquid Mixture In Vertical Columns (Based On Experimental Data), 2010, pp. 348-354. doi: 10.1063/1.3366389

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 2

PDF (Russian) - 1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2025 Kozhevnikov E.V., Ivanov Z.G., Farid Bin Abu Bakar A., Azlan Mustapha K., Kobyakov D.V., Yu L., Belkov F.B., Fedurov D.S., Petrovykh A.P.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies