Полный текст

Introduction In oil well operations a decrease in flow rates and an increase in reservoir energy consumption are usually due to various factors including collector deformation, degassing, salt and paraffindeposition. To increase flow rates and reduce reservoir energy consumptiona variety of production enhancement methods can be applied. And after conducting production enhancement operations, the impact on the increase in oil production of various technological parameters should be assessed. One of the effective methods to increase well productivity and reduce reservoir energy consumption for fluid movement in the bottomhole formation zone is the abrasive jet perforation technology. Perm scientists under the leadership of N.I. Krysin [1] have developed a method of creating deep filtration channels using the features of the dynamic behavior of abrasive jet perforation in a combination with Production Tubing (PT) lift and an appropriate implementation of the relevant regimes of Abrasive Jet Perforation (AJP). Unlike the known and established technologies, it is recommended to make AJP without the use of perforator's movers and centering devices. Long, wide slots are formed due to the PT column extraction in the transition from one to another operating mode,the longitudinal and transverse vibrations of perforator are generated. AJP is performed in two stages at the working pressures of twenty and thirty MPa (for wells up to 2500 meters). During the performance in the first stage, there is a creation of slot channels in the production casing, cement, and reservoir rockto a certain depth. In the second stage there is an increase in the length of the PT, ashiftof AJP and formation of slot filter channels below the place where cracks were formed during the first stage and deepening of the slots already created. At the same in the second stage, a speed of creating perforation channels increases significantly because of a more high-speed sand carrier liquid discharge from nozzles reducing a backflow resistance. The created slot filtration channels increase in transverse dimensions due to the longitudinal and transverse vibrations of abrasive jet perforator. As a result of these actions at eachrun using the perforator with four nozzles, it is possible to cut four channels disposed at an angle of 90°. This allows to obtain a significant increase in filtration area and reduction of filtration resistance. Operating practice of abrasive jet perforation The paper deals with indicators of well operating in fractured carbonate reservoir on one of the fields of the Perm Region (Table 1). Table 1 Geological and physical characteristics of a reservoir of the Perm Region Characteristics Value The average total thickness, m 28.2 Average oil saturated thickness, m 4.4 Porosity, % 15 Core permeability, µm2 0.008 Initial reservoir temperature, °С 23 Initial reservoir pressure, MPa 15.5 Oil viscosity at reservoir conditions, mPa∙s 2.41 Oil density at reservoir conditions, g/cm3 0.804 Oil density in the surface conditions, g/cm3 0.839 Paraffin content in oil, % 2.71 Saturation pressure, MPa 13.58 Gas content, m3/t 53.8 Over the well lifetime, two well production enhancement operations were performed, the AJP with the acid treatment and two years lateronly acid treatment. For the AJP a perforator of construction [2] was used. The AJP parameters in the well were as follows: perforator nozzle`s diameter (dnoz) 6 mm, sand carrier liquid density (rsl) 1057.75 kg/m3, PT of K brand with diameter (dPT) 73 mm, number of perforator's nozzles (n) 2 units. A quartz sand of the GS-PK brand (fractions of 1.0...0.63) was used. The AJP was conducted in two stages wherein the first the injection pressure of the sand carrier liquid was 20 MPa and in the second - 30 MPa. By increasing the injection pressure of the sand fluid carrier, an extension of the PT column and vertical cuts and channels were achieved. The rock cavern is washed out into apear shapewhich size depends on the rock strength, the duration of exposure and the power of sand and liquid jet (Fig. 1). Fig. 1. A schematic of the bottomhole formation zone after AJP where 1 - casing string; 2 - cement stone; 3 - rocks; 4 - perforation channel Six cuts in the production casing were made at depths from 1836.2 to 1830.8 m by pumping of either 1960 or 700 kg of sand on each level. The injection time on each mode was between 15 and 20 min. After the AJP process, a hydrochloric acid treatment was conducted with the DN-9010 to increase the volume of filtration channels. The height of slots formed at the working pressure (P1) of 20 MPa will be called the first mode and at the working pressure (P2) of 30 MPa the second mode. Results in estimation of AJP With a cross-section area of the PT (Sp.PT) of 0.00302 m2 and a cross-section area of the PT metal (Sm.PT) - of 0.00116 m2, the PT column extension in the first mode () will be: (1) where E is Young's modulus in Pa; z is coefficient taking into account the friction between the pipe and casing wall. The PT column extension during the second mode () was 0.410 m. Then the height of the slot (ls) was 0.137 m. According to [3-7], for specified conditions of the AJP, the slot depth is 22 cm. We believe that the layer in the well area was homogeneous prior to the AJP, and its average permeability, according to the HDI, was 0.032 m2. After the AJP we assume that the fluid flow to the well is described by the model of zonal inhomogeneous reservoir. It is divided into 2 zones, zone 1where there is a slot and zone 2 where there is no slot. Then, based on the formula of zonal inhomogeneous flow we can determine the permeability in region 1, which amounted to 0.033 µm2. Immediately after the placing in operationits production rate became equal to 36.5 m3/day, while the relative bottomhole and reservoir pressure were 0.45 and 0.99, respectively, and the productivity ratio was 6.2 m3/(day∙MPa). According to [8-12] the production rate after acid treatment during AJP should increase by 4,2 m3/day. Expected initial well production Qex can be identified by the multivariate statistical dependence [8]: (2) The coefficients of the multivariate model А, Ар, Аµ, Аh, Аm, Аk, Аj are determined for specific geological and technical conditions of the development. In terms of operational objects of the Upper Kama region for the Bashkirian deposits the following values were established А = 2.2; Ар = 11.85; Аµ = -2.534; Аh = 0.574; Аm = 0.831, Аk = 0, Аj = 0. On the basis of equation (2) for the well the initial flow rate without enhanced operation's conducting had to be 12.4 m3/day. It turns out that due to AJP conducting the well production increased to 19.9 m3/day. That is, each run with AJP provided an increase in production of about 3 m3/day. Dynamics of well performance When changing the relative bottomhole pressure from 0.45 to 0.25, the value of the well productivity index has declined from 6.2 to 1 m3/(day∙MPa). Also the well oil flow rate decreased from 36.48 to 3.95 m3/day. In [13-16] it is indicated that a decline inwell productivity coefficients is due to rock deformation and oil dissolved gas in afree phase. Let us consider what is a change in well productivity when changing of bottomhole pressure. According to the research undertaken in [17-19], the carbonate reservoirs of the Ozernoe field and the neighboring fields have substantial fracturing. Closures of vertical fractures occur during pressure decreasing below the lateral rock pressure, which for the Ozernoe field’s conditions was determined by the method described in [17]. With an average density of rocks 2650 kg/m3 and a total porosity of about 15 % for the Ozernoye field`s conditions, the lateral rock pressure is around 5.90 MPa. Let us estimate the general and fracture permeability of rocks in the area of the well within two years following the AJP (see Table 1). According to the data both the general and fracture permeability of rocks significantly declined, resulting in a significant decrease in well production. It is worth noting, that the bottomhole pressure at the borehole walls was below the lateral rock pressure. The average pressure in the bottomhole zone remained above Plat, so fracture permeability did not reduce to 0 (Table 2). Table 2 Changes in the work indicators and BFZ permeability during well operation Time after entering into operation, months Qoil, m3/day Pres, MPa Pbott, MPa Pres/ Psat ktotal, 10-3∙µm2 kfrac, 10-3∙µm2 Secondary completion with AJP and acid treatment 1 36.48 12.23 6.03 0.49 30.60 117.06 5 30.93 12.23 3.89 0.32 25.95 84.18 8 10.84 12.23 3.83 0.31 9.09 10.33 14 9.64 12.23 3.12 0.26 8.09 8.18 16 7.78 12.23 2.78 0.23 6.53 5.32 22 3.95 14.51 3.11 0.21 3.32 1.38 Acid treatment 23 36.23 14.50 5.30 0.37 30.39 115.46 24 34.23 14.50 9.7 0.7 28.72 103.11 30 26.26 14.11 7.69 0.55 22.03 60.68 36 24.96 14.11 6.47 0.46 20.94 54.80 40 22.31 14.27 3.71 0.26 18.72 43.79 43 14.92 14.58 2.43 0.17 12.52 19.58 44 13.81 14.58 2.65 0.18 11.59 16.78 Two years later after the AJP an acid treatment was carried out on the well with DN-9010 composition (Vacid = 30 m3) with a simultaneous increase in bottomhole pressure in 1.8 times. Thereafter, the productivity index reached its initial value. The value of production rate increase after acid treatment exceeded the values obtained for the dependences of the [8-10, 20]. According to [8-10] the production rate had to increase by 4.88 m3/day. It turns out that the rest of the production rate increase was due to changes in the bottomhole pressure. Within two years after the acid treatment the bottomhole pressure decreased, and at the same time production rate reduced (see Fig. 2). Fig. 2. Changing in well working parameters during the operation The values of total and fracture permeability, productivity index reduced similar to the period following the AJP. It is worth noting that with a decrease in the productivity ratios and the flow rates of the well after repeated acid treatment, they remained below the values at the same bottomhole pressure before the acid treatment (see Fig. 3). Moreover, the well productivity coefficients do not fully recover after a significant reduction in pressure in the bottomhole formation zone. This phenomenon may be associated with plastic deformation of rocks. When we look at Fig. 3 it can be deduced that the well productivity decreases by half. Fig. 3. Dependence of the well productivity index from relative bottomhole pressure Estimation of reservoir energy loss According to the Dupuis formula for fluid inflow into the well, its production rate (for a radial linearly flow in a homogeneous reservoir) can be calculated as (3) where k - reservoir permeability, m2; Pres and Pbott - reservoir and bottomhole pressure, Pa; µ - dynamic viscosity of the fluid, Pa·s; rw and rb - well radius and external boundary radius (reservoir drainage area radius of the well). In case of reducing the permeability of in a circular reservoir area around the well with a radius of rBFZ, a fluid inflow decreases as follows (4) where kRFZ - remote formation zone permeability; S - skin factor - the value which depends on the permeability of BFZ and its size is: (5) where kBFZ - rocks permeability in BFZ. From (4) it follows (6) where kRFZ permeability can be determined by processing the pressure recovery curve, obtained by the study of unsteady well working modes. Let us estimate the impact of changes in BFZ permeability on the reservoir energy consumptions in the well described in Table 3. When the pressure recovery curve is processed it was obtained: kRFZ = 0.0132 µm2; kBFZ = = 0.0076 µm2, in accordance with (6) S = -5.6. That is, in the initial period after the enhancing operation the skin factor is negative and the state of bottomhole zone does not cause a significant loss in formation energy for the fluid inflow into the well. After 22 months following the AJP and acid treatment the BFZ condition deteriorated and skin factor increased to the value of 1.67. Table 3 Initial data for the well Parameter Value Net pay thickness h, m 4.4 Reservoir oil viscosity μo res, Pa·s 2.41·10-3 Well radius rw, m 0.1 External boundary radius rb, m 250 Reservoir pressure Рres, MPa 12.23 Bottomhole pressure before stop Рbott, MPa 6.03 Well production before stop qS, m3/day 36.48 According to the formula (7), the loss of reservoir pressure to overcome the additional resistance in BFZ amounts as 0.17 MPa, (7) Thus, 1.5 % of the total depression on a layer (formation energy) ΔPres = Pres - Pbott = 11.4 MPa is spent on overcoming the action of the skin effect in BFZ. Table 4 lists the results of processing the PRC and the calculations for the well. After the second operation (acid treatment) additional losses of energy in the BFZ are not observed. Table 4 Pressure losses in BFZ No. Time after entering into operation, months Flow rate Ql, m3/day Depression on a layer, MPa Skin factor Additional pressure loss ΔРs ΔРs share of total depression, % Secondary completion with AJP and acid treatment 1 1 36.48 6.02 -5.60 - - 2 5 30.93 8.34 -0.89 - - 3 8 10.84 8.40 -0.85 - - 4 14 9.64 9.11 -0.25 - - 5 16 7.78 9.45 0.03 0.01 0.04 6 22 3.95 11.4 1.67 0.17 1.52 Acid treatment 7 23 36.23 9.2 -0.18 - - 8 24 34.23 4.8 -3.83 - - 9 30 26.26 6.42 -2.49 - - 10 36 24.96 7.64 -1.47 - - 11 40 22.31 10.56 0.95 0.10 0.94 12 43 14.92 12.15 2.28 0.24 1.95 13 44 13.81 11.93 2.09 0.22 1.82 Conclusions The paper analyzes the results of an abrasive jet perforation with acid treatment and acid treatment alone on one of the wells in the field of the Perm Region. It was found that during the AJP with acid treatment a growth in oil production by the AJP and acid treatments amounted to about 65 and 35 % respectively. The acid treatment carried out two years later acid, has resulted in an increase in oil production, which was 15 % due to the acid treatment and 85 % due to the growth of bottomhole pressure and fracture permeability’s increase. Abrasive Jet Perforation helps to increase slightly well production rate and to decrease a reservoir energy consumption for fluid communications in the bottomhole formation zone. It is recommended to maintain the reservoir and bottomhole pressures higher than the lateral rock pressure for increasing effectiveness of well operations in reservoirs with advanced natural fracturing.

Об авторах

Мариан Уирсигроч

Автор, ответственный за переписку.
Email: m.wiercigrouch@abdn.ac.uk
AB24 3UE, Шотландия, г. Абердин, Местон Билдинг, 39

доктор технических наук, профессор Школы инженерии

Владимир Валерьевич Поплыгин

Email: poplygin@bk.ru
614990, Россия, г. Пермь, Комсомольский пр., 29

кандидат технических наук, доцент кафедры нефтегазовых технологий

Дмитрий Юрьевич Русинов

Email: rusinovdu@bk.ru
614990, Россия, г. Пермь, Комсомольский пр., 29

аспирант кафедры нефтегазовых технологий

Список литературы

Статистика

Просмотры

Аннотация - 342

PDF (Russian) - 33

PDF (English) - 50

Ссылки

• Ссылки не определены.